The pervasive claim that secondhand smoke is 23 times more toxic in cars than in the home does not appear to be based on scientific evidence.Still think you should believe what the experts say?
The widely reported 'fact' appears to have originated in a 1998 Rocky Mountain News story about proposed legislation to ban smoking in cars containing children, according to Ross MacKenzie, MA, and Becky Freeman, MSc, of the University of Sydney School of Public Health in Australia.
In the story, the state legislator who introduced the legislation was quoted as saying she had become concerned about the issue upon hearing the now ubiquitous claim.
The statement continues to pop up in the medical literature, on government and advocacy organization Web sites, and in the mass media to this day.
However, MacKenzie and Freeman were unable to find an original scientific source for the figure.
Perpetuation of the claim presents a credibility problem, MacKenzie and Freeman wrote in an analysis in CMAJ.
Fitness Watch is your site for making sense of fitness advice.
"Truth" has a shelf life.
The shelf life of "truth" is very short in the domains of fitness, health and well-being.
The reason is that so much of what we are told is "true" is really baseless.
At Fitness Watch we separate fitness information from fitness noise.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
No Facts to Back Up This Secondhand Smoke Claim
This claim and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.