So to get ready for front-of-package nutrition labeling, the F.D.A. is now looking at bringing serving sizes for foods like chips, cookies, breakfast cereals and ice cream into line with how Americans really eat. Combined with more prominent labeling, the result could be a greater sense of public caution about unhealthy foods.Whether it will make a difference by "scaring" people, who can say?
“If you put on a meaningful portion size, it would scare a lot of people,” said Barry Popkin, a nutrition professor at the University of North Carolina. “They would see, ‘I’m going to get 300 calories from that, or 500 calories.’ ”
The problem is important because the standard serving size shown on a package determines all the other nutritional values on the label, including calorie counts. If the serving size is smaller than what people really eat, unless they study the label carefully they may think they are getting fewer calories or other nutrients than they are.
But it is right to have nutrition labels that are more reflective of reality.
If you want to see a what a good nutrition label would look like, go here.
2 comments:
Hi, Rahim and welcome to Fitness Watch.
Please do not promote websites that advocate for detox cleanses on this site.
Feel free to visit any time as long as you do not post ads.
Thank you.
Post a Comment